On page one of The Rules of Golf the “spirit of the game of golf” is discussed as well as a player’s responsibility to abide by/uphold the spirit of the game. The pertinent passage reads, “All players shall conduct themselves in a disciplined manner, demonstrating courtesy and sportsmanship at all times, irrespective of how competitive they may be. This is the spirit of the game of golf.” Perhaps that was the spirit of the game at some point in time. Certainly in the era when golf was “colf,” a nine was niblick named, and St. Andrews “wrote” the rules. It remained that way when the Jones that mattered was Bobby, when King Arnold reigned and through the golden years of Jack the Bear.
Golf has been touted for centuries as a “gentlemen’s game,” and, I believe, rightly so. Of course, nowadays we would have to modify that to “gentleperson’s game,” given the belated inclusion of women in the sport. In Golf World’s January 2007 issue, Bob Verdi wrote, “Golf is far from perfect, but it is a square peg in the round sewer hole of sports.” I would agree with Bob, because, John Daly notwithstanding, you don’t often read about the legal woes of professional golfers.
Can you imagine Tiger being arrested for smuggling Thai stick into the country on his return from the Asian tour? Or how Luke Donald or Retief Goosen being pulled over for doing 90 in 45 zone, with illegal weapons in their cars? These are scenarios we have seen repeatedly with professional athletes in other sports, but aren’t likely to see with professional golfers. Golf may be the last bastion of civility in modern sports, but the infidels are storming the citadel, and the keepers of the tower may need to erect additional defenses.
As one who cradles the game gently to my breast, it is the odd weekend indeed that passes without my rear end settling into the imprint left there from the previous weekend’s date with the game I love. It may be my imagination, but as I have observed over time, it seems that some of the spirit that once imbued the game has been expunged by modern mores. Cutesy has replaced courtesy. Boo Weekly, he of the squirting tobacco juice all over the venue through which other players must roll their balls, is now a golfing hero. Courtesy indeed! Acts of sportsmanship through which the spirit of the game flowed onto the links is being threatened by displays of gamesmanship.
Tiger Woods is the primary torchbearer for the game today, much like Jones, Palmer, and Nicklaus were the bearers in their time. Throughout the match that Tiger lost to Nick O’Hern at the World Golf Championships-Accenture Match Play, Woods refused to concede two-foot putts to O’Hern, despite O’Hern’s routine concession of such putts to Tiger. This was in the Bobby Jones bracket of the tournament no less. Is there much question as to what Jones, the ultimate sportsman, would make of Woods’ behavior?
What a contrast to Nicklaus’s display of sportsmanship when he conceded Tony Jacklin’s two-foot putt in the 1969 Ryder Cup allowing the Europeans to tie. According to accounts of the event, Jack said, “I don’t think you would have missed that putt but in these circumstances I would never give you the opportunity.” Jack did this during the Ryder Cup, the most pressure-packed golf venue where the desire to win is perhaps greater than at any other.
In Golf World’s March 2 issue, John Hawkins recounts Tiger’s “slightly muffled obscenities” and other angry displays after his loss to O’Hern. When we combine the above with Tiger’s failure to grant an interview after the loss and blaming a ball mark for his defeat, it appears that the world’s best golfer is complicit in the/guilty of assault on the spirit of the game. Even though Hawkins discussed Woods’s blaming his miss on a ball mark and his churlish behavior after the loss, he did nothing to place such behavior in the context of the spirit of the game. Unfortunately none of the commentators during the broadcast of the match had the chutzpa to call Tiger on his boorish behavior and its contribution to the erosion of the spirit of the game.
I believe Earl Woods raised Tiger to be a sportsman and an ambassador of/for the game, as well as the greatest golfer who ever lived. Generally Tiger has lived up to his dad’s efforts. On the course he has shown the kind of mental toughness that we have seen previously only with Nicklaus in amassing a professional record that is unprecedented even by Jack. He has also conducted himself well in the course and has been gracious in interviews and in his dealing with the public.
However, although TV commentators continue to tout Tiger’s mental toughness, there has been some slippage in the discipline and strength of mind that has made him the best player in the game today and potentially the best ever. In his first six years on tour, Tiger made plenty of errors, but rarely did he make wayward swings and miss makeable putts on holes 16 - 18 when he was in contention. Such swings and putts aren’t so rare these days, and his struggles during his match with O’Hern (the missed putt on the 19th hole and bogey on the 20th) are indications of the chink in Tiger’s armor.
The steely discipline that it takes to conduct oneself with class when things aren’t going well, to be pleasant in the face of disappointing defeat, has also been a Tiger trait. Yet recently, I have seen some very obvious displays of anger on the course, and his behavior during and after the Accenture may be indications that Tiger is straying from the course so carefully carved out by his dad. I suspect that the late Mr. Woods would be more disappointed by Tiger’s failure to conduct himself according to the spirit of the game than by his failure to make the short putt to win the O’Hern match.
Tiger has acknowledged that he is greatly motivated by his desire to surpass Nicklaus’s records and to assume his place in golf history. Does he have the ability to break Jack Nicklaus’s record for major wins or Byron Nelson’s for total wins? I don’t believe anyone who knows the game questions that. Nicklaus himself has noted as much. Does Tiger have the strength of mind and character to do it? I have always believed so, but I am beginning to wonder. If what I have observed recently is a portent of things to come, then it appears that Tiger will have a more difficult time than anticipated equaling Jack’s golfing achievements. Perhaps of greater importance, he will have a much tougher challenge matching Jack’s character whether he aspires to such heights or not.
I doubt that Tiger wants to win any more than Nicklaus and Jones did. However, Jack and Bobby had the presence of mind to understand the magnitude of their role as the greatest golfer the world had seen to date, and the strength/quality of character to conduct themselves accordingly. Golf is as much a display of character as it is a display of skill. All of the great ones understood this and demonstrated that understanding. When Earl Woods was around, it seemed that Tiger understood this as well. Without Earl’s guiding force, it appears that Tiger may be forgetting.
Let us hope that the world’s greatest physical golf talent remembers before too long that the mantle he carries is not to be sullied by boorish behavior fueled by an unbridled desire to win. Tiger is no cub anymore and is about to bring a child into the world. Hopefully the example he wants to set isn’t the one that he offered at the Accenture, but the one that Earl Woods provided for him as a dad and Jack Nicklaus and Bobby Jones provided as role models on and off the golf course.Article Source: http://www.bettergolfarticles.com